Synthetic data and synthetic personas for market research

Synthetic data for marketing to cloud service providers, a case study

When a technology services company sought to develop solutions for partners within a major technology ecosystem, they faced the challenge of understanding two distinct but interconnected audiences: the partners themselves and the ecosystem managers who controlled access and recommendations.

Traditional market research with technology partners proved challenging due to corporate access restrictions, busy professional schedules, and the need to understand both technical and business decision-making psychology across multiple partner types and geographic regions.

Surveyed ecosystem stakeholders and partner managers in complex B2B environments. The resulting Strategic Intelligence revealed exactly where our client could focus for premium buyer conversion and risk-free market entry.

  • Premium buyer identification: Mathematical correlation between specific pain points and a 2.1× higher willingness to invest, enabling precision qualification frameworks.
  • Gatekeeping layer discovery: Ecosystem managers control access to 15–50 partners each, opening a distribution strategy that bypasses direct acquisition challenges.
  • Expertise barrier revelation: 84% of buyers require specialised ecosystem knowledge as a critical qualification, creating a competitive moat against generic solutions.
  • Dual perspective validation: Independent research with both partners and ecosystem managers revealed identical pain points and solution requirements, eliminating market assumption risk.

Using our Asymmetric Strategic Intelligence (ASI) methodology, we conducted comprehensive Strategic Intelligence gathering through two separate studies:

  • 126 Client Proxies (synthetic personas) representing technology partners across five partner categories
  • 26 Client Proxies representing ecosystem managers with different portfolio specialisations and regional responsibilities.

The research uncovered mathematical correlations between the two audiences. These insights pinpointed:

  • Specific pain points
  • Premium investment willingness
  • Precision targeting frameworks.

Most critically, the intelligence revealed that:

  • Ecosystem managers were the gatekeepers. Without them behind the product, the product was dead before it started.
  • Ecosystem managers and partners demand identical and specific expertise requirements that create insurmountable barriers for generic competitors.

The Strategic Intelligence (synthetic data) enabled a complete transformation from broad market approaches to precision targeting strategies with validated competitive advantages.

The complex ecosystem research challenge

Technology ecosystem market research presents unique challenges when trying to understand partner audiences and ecosystem management dynamics:

  • Dual audience complexity: Partners and ecosystem managers with different perspectives on identical solutions
  • Corporate access barriers: Enterprise technology professionals heavily protected from external research
  • Geographic distribution: Global partner networks across multiple regions with different operational patterns
  • Technical sophistication variance: Partners ranging from highly technical specialists to business-focused service providers
  • Ecosystem program complexity: Multiple partner types with different revenue models, capabilities, and strategic priorities

These challenges make conventional research approaches problematic:

  • Survey response rates typically below 10% for enterprise technology audiences
  • Access to ecosystem managers extremely limited through traditional channels
  • Sample sizes often insufficient for statistical confidence across partner segments
  • Interview coordination complicated by global time zones and corporate protocols
  • Existing partner feedback may not represent broader market opportunity or competitive landscape

The ASI Research solution: Dual perspective Strategic Intelligence

ASI Research overcame these limitations by creating sophisticated AI-generated Client Proxies representing both partner and ecosystem manager perspectives with perfect demographic control and comprehensive coverage.

Methodology implementation

Partner perspective research: 126 Client Proxies representing technology partners across five distinct categories, incorporating technical sophistication levels, company sizes, geographic regions, ecosystem program participation levels, and growth trajectories.

Ecosystem manager perspective research: 26 Client Proxies representing ecosystem managers with different portfolio specialisations, geographic responsibilities, partner portfolio sizes, and experience levels within the technology ecosystem.

Cross-validation approach: Separate research studies designed to identify convergence patterns and validate market assumptions through independent perspective analysis.

Why ASI Research succeeds where traditional methods struggle

Perfect demographic representation: Precise control over partner types, technical levels, and ecosystem manager specialisations
Unfiltered insights: No corporate messaging constraints or social desirability bias affecting responses
Comprehensive coverage: Includes partners and managers across all relevant segments and experience levels
Mathematical validation: Large enough sample sizes for statistical confidence in correlation analysis
Competitive intelligence: Insights into decision psychology that competitors cannot access through conventional research

What this research revealed

The research showed us three things that changed everything:

  1. We could predict who would pay premium prices — Ask about one specific problem, find buyers willing to pay 2x more
  2. We found the shortcut to reach everyone — Get 5 ecosystem managers on your side instead of chasing 500 partners
  3. We discovered the barrier that stops competitors — 84% demand specialist knowledge that generic companies can’t provide

These discoveries transformed a scattered marketing approach into a precision targeting strategy.

We found the buyers who pay premium prices

The research found something amazing: certain partners were willing to pay premium prices. Not all partners — just those with one specific problem.

Partners with this problem paid premium rates 34% of the time. Partners with other problems only paid premium rates 11% of the time.

This meant we could predict who would buy expensive solutions. Ask about this one problem, and you’d find buyers willing to pay 2x more than average.

We discovered the gatekeepers who control everything

It would be easy to think the best route to market would be to reach these customer directly. However, every ecosystem manager controls access to 15-50 potential customers.

Instead of calling 500 partners individually, you can get 5 ecosystem managers to recommend you to their entire portfolios.

But there’s a catch: 84% of ecosystem managers won’t recommend anyone unless they have deep specialist knowledge. Generic providers get eliminated immediately.

Both sides wanted exactly the same thing

We asked partners what they needed. Then we asked ecosystem managers what they’d recommend.

The answers matched perfectly:

Partners said: “We need someone who really understands our ecosystem” (73% said this was critical)
Ecosystem managers said: “I only recommend specialists who understand our ecosystem” (84% said this was required)

This proved that specialist knowledge wasn’t just helpful — it was the price of entry.

The decision psychology alignment

Cross-analysis revealed that ecosystem managers accurately identified partner pain points and investment psychology. 92.3% of ecosystem managers correctly identified the premium buyer segment, while their solution requirements aligned perfectly with partner demands.

This alignment meant that successful partner strategies would simultaneously satisfy ecosystem manager recommendation criteria.

How this changed their business

Before: Wasting time and money

  • Calling hundreds of partners with no way to predict who would buy
  • Competing against cheaper generic providers
  • Struggling to justify premium pricing

After: Precision targeting that works

  • Find premium buyers immediately: Ask one question, identify 2x higher conversion rates
  • Reach 250 partners through 5 advocates: Ecosystem managers recommend you to their entire portfolios
  • Eliminate 90% of competitors: Specialist knowledge requirements that generic providers can’t meet
  • Justify premium pricing: Deep expertise that partners actually demand and pay for

ASI methodology spectrum: Research enabling precision implementation

This project demonstrates how ASI Research and ASI Advisor methodologies create integrated competitive advantages.

ASI Research provides market foundation

  • Target identification: Mathematical buyer signals and precision qualification criteria
  • Decision psychology: What drives partner investment and ecosystem manager recommendations
  • Competitive landscape: Expertise requirements that create sustainable market barriers
  • Implementation preferences: Integration models that maximise adoption and retention

ASI Advisors enable strategic execution

  • Precision targeting: Custom AI trained on mathematical buyer qualification frameworks
  • Ecosystem positioning: Maintains specialised expertise requirements across all communications
  • Relationship development: Optimised approaches for ecosystem manager advocacy building
  • Competitive differentiation: Communicates technical sophistication that justifies premium positioning

Integrated transformation results

Organisations implementing both ASI Research and ASI Advisors achieve sustainable competitive advantages:

  • Market intelligence reveals targeting precision competitors cannot access
  • Implementation capability executes strategies with ecosystem-specific sophistication
  • Continuous optimisation refines approaches based on ecosystem manager feedback
  • Competitive moat combines market understanding with execution excellence

Strategic intelligence validation and market confirmation

The ASI Research gained credibility through methodological rigour and cross-validation approaches that ensured authentic insights rather than artificial intelligence assumptions.

Cross-perspective validation

The separate partner and ecosystem manager studies provided independent validation of market dynamics, pain points, and solution requirements. Convergence between perspectives eliminated research bias whilst confirming strategic assumptions.

Mathematical confidence levels

Correlation analysis achieved statistical significance through comprehensive sample sizes (126 partner and 26 ecosystem manager Client Proxies) across multiple demographic and psychographic variables.

Geographic consistency verification

Regional analysis confirmed that premium buyer patterns held across different markets while identifying specific cultural adaptations required for optimal positioning.

Expertise requirement authentication

Both audiences independently identified identical specialised knowledge requirements, validating that expertise barriers represented genuine market dynamics rather than research artifacts.

What this means for technology ecosystem Strategic Intelligence

This project demonstrates how ASI Research transforms market understanding for organisations serving complex partner networks and ecosystem relationships.

When your target audiences include both end-users and intermediary gatekeepers, when expertise requirements create competitive barriers, and when mathematical precision in targeting determines resource allocation efficiency, ASI Research provides comprehensive market intelligence that traditional methods cannot deliver.

The methodology works particularly well for:

  • Technology platform providers building partner ecosystems and enablement programmes
  • Service organisations competing in markets where specialised knowledge creates advantages
  • B2B solution providers requiring precision targeting to justify premium positioning
  • Ecosystem participants seeking competitive advantage through superior market understanding

The combination of ASI Research market intelligence with ASI Advisor implementation creates sustainable competitive advantages through research-informed targeting and consistent professional execution.

The Strategic Intelligence advantage

Strategic intelligence represents essential competitive capability for organisations operating within complex technology ecosystems. While competitors struggle with traditional research limitations or operate based on industry assumptions, ASI Research provides mathematical precision in targeting, validated expertise requirements, and ecosystem relationship strategies.

This technology ecosystem transformation demonstrates how Strategic Intelligence translates into immediate competitive advantage: precision qualification instead of broad outreach, mathematical buyer correlation instead of demographic guessing, and ecosystem gatekeeping strategy instead of direct acquisition struggles.

When serving enterprise technology audiences requires both market sophistication and technical credibility, ASI Research methodology provides the market intelligence foundation for sustainable competitive advantage.

For a practical conversation about how ASI Research would work for your ecosystem market intelligence challenges, please use the form below or email Steven Lewis at steven@taleist.agency.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.